Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Arnold & Anor
The court has jurisdiction to entertain disqualification proceedings under CDDA Section 6(3)(c) where an administrator has been appointed, even if the company has subsequently been dissolved under IA86 Schedule B1, Paragraph 84(6), because jurisdiction is determined by the position at the time of the administrator's appointment, not at the time of dissolution.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry; Defendant: Jason Arnold; Defendant: Keith James Hopley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Disqualification Proceedings / Jurisdictional Determination
- Outcome
- declaration granted
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Company Dissolution, Court Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
Claimant
Jason Arnold
Defendant
Keith James Hopley
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Disqualification Proceedings / Jurisdictional Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain disqualification proceedings under CDDA Section 6 where the company has been dissolved under IA86 Schedule B1, Paragraph 84(6)
- 2 Whether an application under CA Section 651 is necessary to void the dissolution before disqualification proceedings can proceed
- 3 Whether disqualification proceedings commenced prior to a CA Section 651 order are a nullity
Ratio Decidendi
The court has jurisdiction to entertain disqualification proceedings under CDDA Section 6(3)(c) where an administrator has been appointed, even if the company has subsequently been dissolved under IA86 Schedule B1, Paragraph 84(6), because jurisdiction is determined by the position at the time of the administrator's appointment, not at the time of dissolution.
Court Disposition
declaration granted
Orders
- Declaration granted in terms of paragraph 1 of the SSTI’s application notice dated 5th April 2007; further directions to be given as necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment