Jason Black v Information Commissioner & Anor

Jason Black v Information Commissioner & Anor

Disclosure of the requested road inspection reports would more likely than not adversely affect the course of justice by enabling fraudulent claims and undermining procedural safeguards. The public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

Parties
Appellant: Jason Blake; First Respondent: Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Leicestershire County Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Environmental Information Regulations, Freedom of Information, Public Interest Test, Fraud Prevention, Civil Procedure
Administrative Law Information Law Environmental Information Regulations Freedom of Information Public Interest Test Fraud Prevention Civil Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jason Blake

Appellant

Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Leicestershire County Council

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether disclosure of road inspection reports would adversely affect the course of justice under EIR regulation 12(5)(b)
  2. 2 Whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the public interest in maintaining the exception

Ratio Decidendi

Disclosure of the requested road inspection reports would more likely than not adversely affect the course of justice by enabling fraudulent claims and undermining procedural safeguards. The public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Decision Notice is upheld
  • The appeal is dismissed