Glint Pay Ltd & Ors v Jason Daniel Baker & Anor

Glint Pay Ltd & Ors v Jason Daniel Baker & Anor

The assignment of the secured debt and rights to Niven was valid; the information obligations were breached, constituting an event of default; the appointment of administrators was not for an improper purpose; no implied Braganza term applied; and the claimants are estopped from challenging the validity of the appointment.

Parties
Claimant: Glint Pay Ltd; Claimant: Glint Pay Services Ltd; Claimant: Glint Pay UK Ltd; Defendant: Jason Daniel Baker; Defendant: Geoffrey Paul Rowley
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Summary Judgment/strike Out Application
Outcome
Claim Form and Particulars of Claim struck out; summary judgment granted for Defendants.
Legal Topics
Appointment of Administrators, Validity of Assignment, Event of Default, Proper Purpose Rule, Implied Terms, Estoppel
Insolvency Commercial Law Contract Law Appointment of Administrators Validity of Assignment Event of Default Proper Purpose Rule Implied Terms +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 34 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Glint Pay Ltd

Claimant

Glint Pay Services Ltd

Claimant

Glint Pay UK Ltd

Claimant

Jason Daniel Baker

Defendant

Geoffrey Paul Rowley

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Summary Judgment/strike Out Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the assignment of the secured debt and rights to Niven was valid
  2. 2 Whether the information obligations were breached and constituted an event of default
  3. 3 Whether the appointment of administrators was for a proper purpose

Ratio Decidendi

The assignment of the secured debt and rights to Niven was valid; the information obligations were breached, constituting an event of default; the appointment of administrators was not for an improper purpose; no implied Braganza term applied; and the claimants are estopped from challenging the validity of the appointment.

Court Disposition

Claim Form and Particulars of Claim struck out; summary judgment granted for Defendants.

Orders

  • Claim Form and Particulars of Claim struck out on grounds of no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim and no real prospect of success.