Grant, R v
The minimum term for the defendant's life sentence is set at 16 years, less the period spent in custody on remand, due to substantial aggravating factors, absence of mitigation, and the trial judge's recommendation, in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
- Parties
- Claimant: R; Defendant: Jason Scott Grant
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Minimum Term Review After Conviction and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Minimum term for life sentence set at 15 years and 17 days, after deduction for remand custody.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Conspiracy to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Minimum Term Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Claimant
Jason Scott Grant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Minimum Term Review After Conviction and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate minimum term to be imposed for the defendant's life sentence for murder under the Criminal Justice Act 2003?
- 2 Are there any aggravating or mitigating factors affecting the minimum term?
- 3 Should the period spent in custody on remand be deducted from the minimum term?
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term for the defendant's life sentence is set at 16 years, less the period spent in custody on remand, due to substantial aggravating factors, absence of mitigation, and the trial judge's recommendation, in accordance with the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
Court Disposition
Minimum term for life sentence set at 15 years and 17 days, after deduction for remand custody.
Orders
- Defendant to serve a minimum term of 15 years and 17 days before eligibility for parole.
- Defendant to remain on licence for life after release and may be recalled to prison at any time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment