Oliver v Shaikh [2020] EWHC 2658 (QB) (08 October 2020)
Given the defendant's deliberate, persistent, and ongoing breaches of the court's order, lack of remorse, and the significant harm caused to both the claimant and the authority of the court, only a period of immediate imprisonment is sufficient to reflect the seriousness of the contempt and to secure compliance.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2658
- Parties
- Claimant: Simon Oliver; Defendant: Javed Shaikh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Committal for Contempt of Court / Penalty/sentencing After Finding of Contempt
- Outcome
- Defendant committed to prison for 16 months for contempt of court; warrant for arrest issued.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Injunctions, Harassment, Online Publication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Oliver
Claimant
Javed Shaikh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Committal for Contempt of Court / Penalty/sentencing After Finding of Contempt
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate penalty for 20 breaches of a court order amounting to contempt of court?
- 2 Does the defendant's continued non-compliance and absence warrant immediate imprisonment?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the defendant's deliberate, persistent, and ongoing breaches of the court's order, lack of remorse, and the significant harm caused to both the claimant and the authority of the court, only a period of immediate imprisonment is sufficient to reflect the seriousness of the contempt and to secure compliance.
Court Disposition
Defendant committed to prison for 16 months for contempt of court; warrant for arrest issued.
Orders
- Defendant to be committed to prison for 16 months.
- Warrant for arrest to be issued.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment