R v Jay Lewis Perry

R v Jay Lewis Perry

The applicant's reasons for delay were insufficient; the grounds of appeal lacked merit; no evidence of jury misconduct or procedural unfairness; proper directions and cross-examination occurred; sufficient evidence was presented; extension of time and leave to appeal refused.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Jay Lewis Perry
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
application for extension of time and leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Coercive and Controlling Behaviour, Assault, Criminal Damage, Appeals Procedure, Jury Integrity
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Coercive and Controlling Behaviour Assault Criminal Damage Appeals Procedure Jury Integrity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Jay Lewis Perry

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was justification for the delay in appealing
  2. 2 Whether grounds of appeal had merit
  3. 3 Whether jury integrity was compromised

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's reasons for delay were insufficient; the grounds of appeal lacked merit; no evidence of jury misconduct or procedural unfairness; proper directions and cross-examination occurred; sufficient evidence was presented; extension of time and leave to appeal refused.

Court Disposition

application for extension of time and leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • extension of time refused
  • leave to appeal refused