HDEB, Re [2026] EWCOP 12 (T2) (04 February 2026)
It is not in HDEB's best interests to appoint JB and SB as personal welfare deputies because collaborative decision-making, as envisaged by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, has worked and continues to work in his best interests. Appointment of deputies would unnecessarily infringe HDEB's autonomy, and in cases of major disagreement, the court should decide rather than deputies. There is no presumption against appointment, but the statutory framework and facts do not justify it here.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCOP 12
- Parties
- Applicant: JB; Applicant: SB; Subject: HDEB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Welfare Deputyship Application / Reconsideration of Dismissal of Application for Appointment as Personal Welfare Deputies
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; permission to appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Personal Welfare Deputies, Best Interests, Autonomy of Incapacitated Adults, Collaborative Decision Making, Section 16 Mental Capacity Act 2005
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JB
Applicant
SB
Applicant
HDEB
Subject
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Welfare Deputyship Application / Reconsideration of Dismissal of Application for Appointment as Personal Welfare Deputies
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in HDEB's best interests to appoint JB and SB as personal welfare deputies
- 2 Application of sections 1, 4, 5, and 16 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to the appointment of deputies
- 3 Appropriate approach to decision-making for incapacitated adults
Ratio Decidendi
It is not in HDEB's best interests to appoint JB and SB as personal welfare deputies because collaborative decision-making, as envisaged by the Mental Capacity Act 2005, has worked and continues to work in his best interests. Appointment of deputies would unnecessarily infringe HDEB's autonomy, and in cases of major disagreement, the court should decide rather than deputies. There is no presumption against appointment, but the statutory framework and facts do not justify it here.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; permission to appeal granted.
Orders
- Application for appointment of JB and SB as personal welfare deputies for HDEB is dismissed.
- Permission to appeal to a Tier 3 judge is granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment