LAX SA v JBC SA
JBC SA failed to establish a good arguable case of loss or provide material for an intelligent estimate of loss, but LAX SA's inability to provide fortification justifies asset disclosure as a condition for maintaining the freezing order.
- Parties
- Claimant: LAX SA; Defendant: JBC SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application / Post Injunction, Application to Vary Injunction
- Outcome
- Application to require fortification refused; asset disclosure ordered as condition for maintaining freezing order.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Asset Disclosure, Undertaking in Damages, Fortification, Jurisdictional Asset Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAX SA
Claimant
JBC SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application / Post Injunction, Application to Vary Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether LAX SA should be required to provide fortification for its cross-undertaking in damages
- 2 Whether LAX SA should be required to disclose assets as a condition for maintaining the freezing order
- 3 Whether JBC SA established a good arguable case of loss warranting fortification
Ratio Decidendi
JBC SA failed to establish a good arguable case of loss or provide material for an intelligent estimate of loss, but LAX SA's inability to provide fortification justifies asset disclosure as a condition for maintaining the freezing order.
Court Disposition
Application to require fortification refused; asset disclosure ordered as condition for maintaining freezing order.
Orders
- LAX SA must provide disclosure of worldwide assets exceeding US$10,000 in value.
- Disclosure capped at cumulative unencumbered equity interest of US$1 million.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment