JD, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 2557 (24 October 2008)
The judge was entitled to comment on the effects of rape and delay in complaint, but his remarks were excessive and lacked balance regarding the appellant's case. However, the summing-up did not render the verdicts unsafe, as the defence case was fairly presented otherwise and the jury's rejection of the appellant's account was justified.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Crim 2557
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: JD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; convictions upheld
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Judicial Directions, Jury Summing Up, Delay in Complaint
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
JD
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's summing-up in a rape case was unfair and unbalanced due to excessive comment on the effects of rape and delay in complaint
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to comment on the effects of rape and delay in complaint, but his remarks were excessive and lacked balance regarding the appellant's case. However, the summing-up did not render the verdicts unsafe, as the defence case was fairly presented otherwise and the jury's rejection of the appellant's account was justified.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; convictions upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment