Olotu v The Home Office & Anor [1996] EWCA Civ 1070 (29 November 1996)

Olotu v The Home Office & Anor [1996] EWCA Civ 1070 (29 November 1996)

The Home Office is not liable for false imprisonment as the prison governor was bound by the court's warrant and could not release the plaintiff without a court order. The CPS is not liable in damages for breach of statutory duty as the statutory scheme did not create a private law right to compensation for failure...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] EWCA Civ 1070
Parties
Plaintiff: Jeanette Ann Olotu; First Defendant: The Home Office; Second Defendant: Crown Prosecution Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 November 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeals allowed in part and dismissed in part; all claims struck out.
Legal Topics
False Imprisonment, Breach of Statutory Duty, Custody Time Limits, Judicial Review, Damages, Bail
Criminal Law Public Law Civil Procedure False Imprisonment Breach of Statutory Duty Custody Time Limits Judicial Review Damages +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jeanette Ann Olotu

Plaintiff

The Home Office

First Defendant

Crown Prosecution Service

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Home Office is liable for false imprisonment for detention beyond custody time limits without a court order for release.
  2. 2 Whether the CPS is liable in damages for breach of statutory duty for failing to bring the plaintiff before the court for bail upon expiry of custody time limits.

Ratio Decidendi

The Home Office is not liable for false imprisonment as the prison governor was bound by the court's warrant and could not release the plaintiff without a court order. The CPS is not liable in damages for breach of statutory duty as the statutory scheme did not create a private law right to compensation for failure to bring the plaintiff before the court for bail; other remedies were available.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed in part and dismissed in part; all claims struck out.

Orders

  • Plaintiff's appeal against Home Office dismissed.
  • CPS's appeal to strike out plaintiff's claim allowed.