Balwant Singh Gill v Jashpal Singh Thind & Ors
The trial judge's finding that Mr Gill received 100 shares in Jeeves Estates Ltd as express trustee for all his grandchildren was a finding of fact supported by the evidence and applicable legal principles. There was no error of law or misapplication of the standard of proof. The appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant; Petitioner/appellant: Balwant Singh Gill; Defendant/respondent; Respondent: Jashpal Singh Thind; Defendant/respondent; Respondent: Baljit Gill Thind; Defendant/respondent: Jasphal Singh Thind, Baljit Gill Thind, Avneesh Singh Thind and Jeevan Singh Thind (as Trustees of the Thind SSAS Pension Fund); Respondent: Jeeves Estates Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Express Trusts, Resulting Trusts, Beneficial Ownership of Shares, Family Company Disputes, Standard of Proof in Civil Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Balwant Singh Gill
Claimant/appellant; Petitioner/appellant
Jashpal Singh Thind
Defendant/respondent; Respondent
Baljit Gill Thind
Defendant/respondent; Respondent
Jasphal Singh Thind, Baljit Gill Thind, Avneesh Singh Thind and Jeevan Singh Thind (as Trustees of the Thind SSAS Pension Fund)
Defendant/respondent
Jeeves Estates Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Gill held 100 shares in Jeeves Estates Ltd on trust for his grandchildren or beneficially
- 2 Whether an express trust was created over the shares in JEL
- 3 Whether the judge erred in finding an express or resulting trust
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's finding that Mr Gill received 100 shares in Jeeves Estates Ltd as express trustee for all his grandchildren was a finding of fact supported by the evidence and applicable legal principles. There was no error of law or misapplication of the standard of proof. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the High Court order stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment