Jeffrey Dudgeon v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The Report contained personal data and special category data of individuals other than the applicant, and disclosure would contravene data protection principles; thus, section 40(2) FOIA applied and the Report could be withheld. The Terms of Reference were exempt under section 31(1)(g) FOIA as disclosure would likely prejudice the Cabinet Office's investigative functions, and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the interest in disclosure. The FCDO breached section 17(1) FOIA by failing to respond within the statutory time limit.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jeffrey Dudgeon; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment After Full Merits Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Personal Data, Exemptions to Disclosure, Public Interest Test, Ministerial Accountability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeffrey Dudgeon
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment After Full Merits Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the FCDO was entitled to withhold the Report under section 40(2) FOIA (personal data exemption)
- 2 Whether the FCDO was entitled to withhold the Terms of Reference under section 31(1)(g) FOIA (law enforcement exemption)
- 3 Whether the FCDO breached section 17(1) FOIA (failure to respond within statutory time)
Ratio Decidendi
The Report contained personal data and special category data of individuals other than the applicant, and disclosure would contravene data protection principles; thus, section 40(2) FOIA applied and the Report could be withheld. The Terms of Reference were exempt under section 31(1)(g) FOIA as disclosure would likely prejudice the Cabinet Office's investigative functions, and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the interest in disclosure. The FCDO breached section 17(1) FOIA by failing to respond within the statutory time limit.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The FCDO is entitled to withhold the Report under section 40(2) FOIA and the Terms of Reference under section 31(1)(g) FOIA. The FCDO breached section 17(1) FOIA for late response.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment