Jeffries v Robb [2012] EWCA Civ 1149 (28 June 2012)
The injunction's terms, including the requirement to use the right of way at a reasonable speed and the prohibition on surveillance, are justified responses to the appellant's conduct and are not unduly restrictive. The penal notice should be replaced with a notice referencing the criminal offence under the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 1149
- Parties
- Applicant: Jeffries; Respondent: Robb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; application for permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Right of Way, Harassment, Injunctions, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeffries
Applicant
Robb
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the terms of the injunction granted by the County Court judge were unduly restrictive or open to misinterpretation, specifically the inclusion of 'at a reasonable speed' and the prohibition on photography/surveillance on the right of way.
- 2 Whether the penal notice attached to the order was appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi
The injunction's terms, including the requirement to use the right of way at a reasonable speed and the prohibition on surveillance, are justified responses to the appellant's conduct and are not unduly restrictive. The penal notice should be replaced with a notice referencing the criminal offence under the Harassment Act 1997.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; application for permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Penal notice struck out and to be replaced with a notice referencing the Harassment Act 1997.
- All other terms of the County Court order affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment