Jeffries v Robb
The appeal was dismissed because the injunction terms were justified by the appellant's misuse of the right of way for surveillance and harassment, and the order had been agreed between counsel. The inclusion of 'at a reasonable speed' was a direct response to the evidence of misuse, and no exception for CCTV use was warranted given the lack of evidence of threats or attacks.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jeffries; Respondent: Robb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; application for permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Right of Way, Harassment, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeffries
Applicant
Robb
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the terms of the injunction granted were unduly restrictive and open to misinterpretation
- 2 Whether the inclusion of 'at a reasonable speed' in the injunction was justified
- 3 Whether the appellant should be permitted to use CCTV on her tractor under the injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the injunction terms were justified by the appellant's misuse of the right of way for surveillance and harassment, and the order had been agreed between counsel. The inclusion of 'at a reasonable speed' was a direct response to the evidence of misuse, and no exception for CCTV use was warranted given the lack of evidence of threats or attacks.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; application for permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Penal notice struck out and replaced with notice warning of criminal offence under Harassment Act 1997.
- Appeal dismissed; injunction terms upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment