Jenna Corderoy v The Information Commissioner & Anor

Jenna Corderoy v The Information Commissioner & Anor

The Home Office was entitled to rely on sections 31, 35, 36, and 24 FOIA to withhold most of the requested information, as the exemptions were properly engaged and the public interest in maintaining them outweighed the public interest in disclosure. However, the Home Office was not entitled to rely on section 31 to withhold page 115 of the closed bundle or information already in the public domain, and must disclose page 115 with redactions for personal data.

Parties
Appellant: Jenna Corderoy; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The Home Office
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 November 2024
Procedural Posture
FOIA Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, National Security Exemptions, Law Enforcement Exemptions, Government Policy Formulation, Public Interest Test
Information Law Administrative Law Human Rights Freedom of Information National Security Exemptions Law Enforcement Exemptions Government Policy Formulation Public Interest Test

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jenna Corderoy

Appellant

The Information Commissioner

First Respondent

The Home Office

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

FOIA Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Home Office was entitled to withhold information under sections 21, 24, 31, 35, and 36 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
  2. 2 Whether the public interest in maintaining the exemptions outweighed the public interest in disclosure
  3. 3 Whether the exemptions were properly engaged for the withheld documents

Ratio Decidendi

The Home Office was entitled to rely on sections 31, 35, 36, and 24 FOIA to withhold most of the requested information, as the exemptions were properly engaged and the public interest in maintaining them outweighed the public interest in disclosure. However, the Home Office was not entitled to rely on section 31 to withhold page 115 of the closed bundle or information already in the public domain, and must disclose page 115 with redactions for personal data.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The Home Office must disclose page 115 of the bundle to the appellant, with redactions for personal information, within 42 days.
  • No further steps are required regarding information already in the public domain.