Vivien Hanson v Jeremy Coleman & Anor
The interests of the beneficiaries are best served by removing the defendants as executors due to conflict of interest, significant delay, breakdown in relationship, and the likelihood of further litigation if they remain in post.
- Parties
- Claimant: Vivien Hanson; Defendant: Jeremy Coleman; Defendant: Marcus Coleman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Removal of Executors / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants removed as executors; independent administrator to be appointed.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Executors, Conflict of Interest, Estate Administration, Delay in Administration, Beneficial Ownership, Self Dealing Rule
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vivien Hanson
Claimant
Jeremy Coleman
Defendant
Marcus Coleman
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Removal of Executors / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants should be removed as executors due to conflict of interest and delay in estate administration
- 2 Whether the defendants' claims against the estate created a conflict
- 3 Whether the administration of the estate has been carried out properly
Ratio Decidendi
The interests of the beneficiaries are best served by removing the defendants as executors due to conflict of interest, significant delay, breakdown in relationship, and the likelihood of further litigation if they remain in post.
Court Disposition
Defendants removed as executors; independent administrator to be appointed.
Orders
- Defendants Jeremy Coleman and Marcus Coleman are removed as executors of Frank Leonard Coleman's estate.
- An independent administrator is to be appointed in their stead.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment