Willmont & Anor v Shlosberg
Trustees may share compulsorily obtained material with liquidators where there is a real prospect of benefit to the bankrupt estate or to facilitate discovery of dishonesty or malpractice, subject to court permission; the Privileged Material Segregation Protocol provides adequate protection for privilege; no breach arises from review of disclosure material by experienced practitioners; no removal of office-holders is warranted absent actual conflict.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jeremy Mark Willmont; Applicant: Michael Finch; Applicant: Emma Sayers; Applicant: Webinvest Limited (in liquidation); Respondent: Mikhail Shlosberg
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Directions Application / Judgment on Applications for Directions Regarding Use of Documents and Information
- Outcome
- Applications granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Disclosure, Legal Professional Privilege, Conflict of Interest, Use of Compelled Material, Disclosure in Litigation, Office Holder Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeremy Mark Willmont
Applicant
Michael Finch
Applicant
Emma Sayers
Applicant
Webinvest Limited (in liquidation)
Applicant
Mikhail Shlosberg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Directions Application / Judgment on Applications for Directions Regarding Use of Documents and Information
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees and liquidators may share compulsorily obtained material
- 2 Proper use of disclosure documents in related proceedings
- 3 Protection of legal professional privilege in bankruptcy and liquidation
Ratio Decidendi
Trustees may share compulsorily obtained material with liquidators where there is a real prospect of benefit to the bankrupt estate or to facilitate discovery of dishonesty or malpractice, subject to court permission; the Privileged Material Segregation Protocol provides adequate protection for privilege; no breach arises from review of disclosure material by experienced practitioners; no removal of office-holders is warranted absent actual conflict.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in part
Orders
- Permission granted to trustees to share compulsion material with liquidators for specified purposes
- Ratification of prior sharing of compulsion material
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment