Fenice Investments Inc v Erram Falkus Construction Ltd
Fenice is entitled to recover from JFC the adjudicator's fees and reasonable legal costs paid, as the fees were not shown to be unreasonable, Fenice acted reasonably in settling, and JFC was contractually obliged to pay under the adjudication agreement and the Scheme.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fenice Investments Inc; Defendant: Jerram Falkus Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted in part for Fenice against JFC.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudicator's Fees, Reasonableness of Professional Fees, Joint and Several Liability, Enforcement of Adjudication Decisions, Contribution Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fenice Investments Inc
Claimant
Jerram Falkus Construction Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Fenice is entitled to recover adjudicator's fees and associated legal costs from JFC
- 2 Whether adjudicator's fees were reasonable
- 3 Whether the only challenge to adjudicator's fees is bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
Fenice is entitled to recover from JFC the adjudicator's fees and reasonable legal costs paid, as the fees were not shown to be unreasonable, Fenice acted reasonably in settling, and JFC was contractually obliged to pay under the adjudication agreement and the Scheme.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted in part for Fenice against JFC.
Orders
- JFC to pay Fenice £20,600 inclusive of VAT and interest within 14 days.
- JFC to pay Fenice £15,750 in costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment