Payone GmbH v Jerry Kofi Logo

Payone GmbH v Jerry Kofi Logo

The defendant's witness statement failed to comply with procedural rules, did not constitute a valid defence or counterclaim except as to the pension issue, and disclosed no reasonable grounds for resisting the claim for a permanent injunction. All other counterclaims were either abusive, estopped, or disclosed no reasonable cause of action. Only the pension-related counterclaim may proceed.

Parties
Claimant: Payone GmbH; Defendant: Jerry Kofi Logo
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (strike Out)
Outcome
Application granted in part
Legal Topics
Strike Out Application, Breach of Confidence, Conversion, Counterclaim, Employment Contract, Whistleblowing, Data Protection, Pension Rights
Employment Law Confidentiality Data Protection Strike Out Application Breach of Confidence Conversion Counterclaim Employment Contract +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Payone GmbH

Claimant

Jerry Kofi Logo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application (strike Out)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's witness statement should be struck out as a defence and counterclaim
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's counterclaims disclose reasonable grounds
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to a permanent injunction safeguarding confidential information

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's witness statement failed to comply with procedural rules, did not constitute a valid defence or counterclaim except as to the pension issue, and disclosed no reasonable grounds for resisting the claim for a permanent injunction. All other counterclaims were either abusive, estopped, or disclosed no reasonable cause of action. Only the pension-related counterclaim may proceed.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part

Orders

  • The defendant's witness statement is struck out in its entirety.
  • The defendant is given permission to file and serve, within 14 days, a counterclaim solely in respect of the pension issue as set out in paragraphs 183 and 197(c) of the revised witness statement.