Lea, R v [2017] EWCA Crim 1789 (02 November 2017)
Although the offence involved a significant quantity of cannabis and was planned, the judge's starting point of 3 years was too high. The correct starting point should have been about 2 years, with further reduction for strong personal mitigation and early guilty plea, resulting in a sentence of 12 months'...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 1789
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Jessica Lea
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Conveyance of Prohibited Articles Into Prison
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Jessica Lea
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 20 months' imprisonment for conveying a list A article (cannabis) into prison was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate application of sentencing guidelines for drug offences to offences under the Prison Act 1952
Ratio Decidendi
Although the offence involved a significant quantity of cannabis and was planned, the judge's starting point of 3 years was too high. The correct starting point should have been about 2 years, with further reduction for strong personal mitigation and early guilty plea, resulting in a sentence of 12 months' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Leave to appeal sentence granted
- Sentence reduced to 12 months' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment