Charles & Ors v Fraser
There was clear and convincing evidence that Mabel and Ethel agreed their estates would be distributed as set out in their 1991 wills and that the survivor would not alter the dispositive provisions after the first death. The Defendant, as executor and beneficiary under Ethel's later will, holds the estate on constructive trust to give effect to the 1991 will.
- Parties
- Claimant: Angela Marilyn Charles; Claimant: Derek Goddard; Claimant: Anne Mabel Thompson; Defendant: Jill Deborah Fraser
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- For the claimants. Declaration of constructive trust in favour of 1991 will beneficiaries.
- Legal Topics
- Mutual Wills, Constructive Trust, Testamentary Capacity, Probate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Marilyn Charles
Claimant
Derek Goddard
Claimant
Anne Mabel Thompson
Claimant
Jill Deborah Fraser
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mabel and Ethel made an agreement rendering their wills mutually irrevocable after the first death
- 2 Whether the estate of Ethel should be distributed according to her 1991 will under the doctrine of mutual wills
Ratio Decidendi
There was clear and convincing evidence that Mabel and Ethel agreed their estates would be distributed as set out in their 1991 wills and that the survivor would not alter the dispositive provisions after the first death. The Defendant, as executor and beneficiary under Ethel's later will, holds the estate on constructive trust to give effect to the 1991 will.
Court Disposition
For the claimants. Declaration of constructive trust in favour of 1991 will beneficiaries.
Orders
- Defendant holds the proceeds of Ethel's estate on trust to give effect to the provisions of Ethel's will dated 22nd January 1991.
- Court to hear counsel on the terms of the appropriate order and ancillary matters.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment