Beighton v Beighton
The matter is adjourned for an oral hearing on notice to the respondent, as the judge cannot determine at this stage whether the applicant's arguments meet the threshold for permission to appeal. The judge identifies arguable issues regarding the approach to division of assets and maintenance, and the need for...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jillian Ann Beighton; Respondent: Timothy George Beighton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal adjourned for oral hearing on notice to the respondent; no order for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Maintenance, Pension Sharing, Appeals Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jillian Ann Beighton
Applicant
Timothy George Beighton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Tier)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower courts erred in their approach to division of matrimonial assets and periodical payments
- 2 Whether the reasonable needs approach was appropriate versus striving for equality
- 3 Whether the imposition of a five-year term on maintenance was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The matter is adjourned for an oral hearing on notice to the respondent, as the judge cannot determine at this stage whether the applicant's arguments meet the threshold for permission to appeal. The judge identifies arguable issues regarding the approach to division of assets and maintenance, and the need for further clarification and representation.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal adjourned for oral hearing on notice to the respondent; no order for costs.
Orders
- Matter adjourned to an oral hearing on notice to the respondent (husband)
- Oral hearing to last one and a half hours
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment