Wei & Ors v Long & Ors [2025] EWHC 912 (KB) (11 April 2025)
Remedies are awarded only for harassment and libel claims of C1, C2, and C3, as these meet the legal threshold and fall within the court's jurisdiction; C4's claims and ECHR-based claims are dismissed as legally impossible or outside territorial scope. Damages are assessed separately for harassment and libel to avoid double counting, applying Vento bands and principles of reputational harm and vindication.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 912 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Xiuling Wei; Claimant: Weiguo Wang; Claimant: Yipeng Wang; Claimant: Anastasiia Marchuk; Defendant: Jingping Long; Defendant: DNC Holdings Inc; Defendant: Gatechina Inc; Defendant: Porkbun LLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (harassment, Defamation, Privacy) / Disposal Hearing After Default Judgment Against D1; Remedies and Damages Assessment
- Outcome
- Judgment for Claimants C1, C2, and C3 against D1; C4's claims dismissed; damages and injunctions granted as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Harassment Under Protection From Harassment Act 1997, Defamation (libel), Malicious Falsehood, Privacy Related Claims, Jurisdiction and Territorial Scope, Assessment of Damages, Default Judgment Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Xiuling Wei
Claimant
Weiguo Wang
Claimant
Yipeng Wang
Claimant
Anastasiia Marchuk
Claimant
Jingping Long
Defendant
DNC Holdings Inc
Defendant
Gatechina Inc
Defendant
Porkbun LLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (harassment, Defamation, Privacy) / Disposal Hearing After Default Judgment Against D1; Remedies and Damages Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should proceed in the absence of D1 after default judgment
- 2 Whether the pleaded claims meet the legal threshold for harassment, libel, malicious falsehood, and privacy
- 3 Assessment of damages for harassment and libel
Ratio Decidendi
Remedies are awarded only for harassment and libel claims of C1, C2, and C3, as these meet the legal threshold and fall within the court's jurisdiction; C4's claims and ECHR-based claims are dismissed as legally impossible or outside territorial scope. Damages are assessed separately for harassment and libel to avoid double counting, applying Vento bands and principles of reputational harm and vindication.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Claimants C1, C2, and C3 against D1; C4's claims dismissed; damages and injunctions granted as specified.
Orders
- General damages for harassment awarded to C1, C2, and C3 (upper Vento band)
- General damages for libel awarded to C1, C2, and C3
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment