ABC & Ors v JKL

ABC & Ors v JKL

The 2010 deed did not reflect the trustees’ true intention, was executed under a mistake, and had unintended adverse tax and substantive consequences. All conditions for rectification are met, and rectification is the minimum necessary to correct the flaws.

Parties
Claimant: ABC; Claimant: DEF; Claimant: GHI; Defendant: JKL
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 September 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Trusts / Judgment on Part 8 Claim for Rectification
Outcome
Rectification granted
Legal Topics
Rectification of Deeds, Mistake in Trust Instruments, Inheritance Tax Consequences, Trustee Powers, Beneficiary Rights
Trusts Property Law Taxation Rectification of Deeds Mistake in Trust Instruments Inheritance Tax Consequences Trustee Powers Beneficiary Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABC

Claimant

DEF

Claimant

GHI

Claimant

JKL

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trusts / Judgment on Part 8 Claim for Rectification

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 2010 deed should be rectified on grounds of mistake
  2. 2 Whether the 2010 deed failed to reflect the trustees’ intentions
  3. 3 Whether the 2010 deed triggered unintended tax consequences and restricted trustee powers

Ratio Decidendi

The 2010 deed did not reflect the trustees’ true intention, was executed under a mistake, and had unintended adverse tax and substantive consequences. All conditions for rectification are met, and rectification is the minimum necessary to correct the flaws.

Court Disposition

Rectification granted

Orders

  • The 2010 deed is rectified in the terms sought by the claimants.