Culliford & Anor vThorpe

Culliford & Anor vThorpe

The court found that there was a clear agreement between the defendant and the deceased to share their properties and assets, and that the defendant relied on this agreement to his detriment by carrying out significant works and expenditure on the property. This gave rise to a common intention constructive trust in favour of the defendant for a 50% beneficial interest. It would be unconscionable for the deceased's estate to deny this interest. The same result would follow under proprietary estoppel.

Parties
Claimant: Stephen John Culliford; Claimant: Dawn Lane; Defendant: Jocelyn Thorpe
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Claim for possession dismissed; declaration of 50% beneficial interest for defendant; order for sale of property and division of proceeds, with adjustment for occupation rent.
Legal Topics
Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel, Beneficial Interest in Property, Remedies in Equity
Property Law Equity Common Intention Constructive Trust Proprietary Estoppel Beneficial Interest in Property Remedies in Equity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen John Culliford

Claimant

Dawn Lane

Claimant

Jocelyn Thorpe

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant has a beneficial interest in the property by way of common intention constructive trust or proprietary estoppel
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is entitled to resist a claim for possession and obtain a declaration of interest in the property

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was a clear agreement between the defendant and the deceased to share their properties and assets, and that the defendant relied on this agreement to his detriment by carrying out significant works and expenditure on the property. This gave rise to a common intention constructive trust in favour of the defendant for a 50% beneficial interest. It would be unconscionable for the deceased's estate to deny this interest. The same result would follow under proprietary estoppel.

Court Disposition

Claim for possession dismissed; declaration of 50% beneficial interest for defendant; order for sale of property and division of proceeds, with adjustment for occupation rent.

Orders

  • The Weston property shall be sold.
  • After discharge of any outstanding mortgage or security, the net proceeds of sale shall be divided equally between the defendant and the deceased’s estate, subject to deduction from the defendant’s share of one half of the occupation rent from the date of death to the date possession is given up or the estate ceases...