R v Danson
Schedules produced by a defence expert from served electronic evidence, representing distilled and relevant material, should be treated as pages of prosecution evidence for the purposes of special preparation claims under the 2013 Regulations. The Determining Officer's exclusion of such schedules was based on an over-literal reading and was incorrect.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Jodie Danson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Special Preparation Fees, Graduated Fee Scheme, Pages of Prosecution Evidence, Electronic Evidence, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Jodie Danson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether schedules produced from electronic evidence by a defence expert can be counted as pages of prosecution evidence for special preparation claims
- 2 Whether the Determining Officer's methodology for assessing special preparation was correct under the 2013 Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
Schedules produced by a defence expert from served electronic evidence, representing distilled and relevant material, should be treated as pages of prosecution evidence for the purposes of special preparation claims under the 2013 Regulations. The Determining Officer's exclusion of such schedules was based on an over-literal reading and was incorrect.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal succeeds in full.
- The appropriate additional payment is to be made to the Applicant, including £450 (exclusive of VAT) for costs and £100 paid on appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment