Taylor & Anor, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 803 (04 April 2007)
The minimum terms imposed were not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the gravity of the offence, the statutory framework, and the aggravating and mitigating factors, including age and maturity.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Crim 803
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: Joel Ison Taylor; Appellant: Joshua Declan Thomas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Minimum Term Sentences
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Robbery, Sentencing, Minimum Term, Juvenile Offenders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
R
Prosecution
Joel Ison Taylor
Appellant
Joshua Declan Thomas
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Minimum Term Sentences
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum terms imposed for murder on juvenile offenders were wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum terms imposed were not wrong in principle or manifestly excessive given the gravity of the offence, the statutory framework, and the aggravating and mitigating factors, including age and maturity.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed
Orders
- Minimum term of 22 years for Joel Ison Taylor upheld.
- Minimum term of 18 years for Joshua Declan Thomas upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment