Sergio Mendes Costa v Dissociadid Limited & Anor.
The conduct of counsel and solicitors was not improper, unreasonable, or negligent within the meaning of s.51(7)(a) Senior Courts Act 1981 or relevant case law; Mr Costa gave instructions for the jurisdiction argument and was warned of risks; wasted costs order not justified.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Sergio Mendes Costa; Defendant/respondent: Dissociadid Limited; Defendant/respondent: Chloe Wilkinson; Respondent: John Anthony Eldridge; Respondent: Brandsmiths Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Wasted Costs Order / Judgment on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application for wasted costs order dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Wasted Costs, Jurisdiction, Mandatory Injunction, Professional Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sergio Mendes Costa
Claimant/applicant
Dissociadid Limited
Defendant/respondent
Chloe Wilkinson
Defendant/respondent
John Anthony Eldridge
Respondent
Brandsmiths Solicitors
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Wasted Costs Order / Judgment on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conduct of counsel and solicitors justified a wasted costs order
- 2 Whether late argument on jurisdiction constituted improper, unreasonable, or negligent conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The conduct of counsel and solicitors was not improper, unreasonable, or negligent within the meaning of s.51(7)(a) Senior Courts Act 1981 or relevant case law; Mr Costa gave instructions for the jurisdiction argument and was warned of risks; wasted costs order not justified.
Court Disposition
Application for wasted costs order dismissed.
Orders
- Mr Costa's application, in both original and amended form, is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment