JOHN ANTHONY TURNER v THE QUEEN
The sentencing judge erred by sentencing on the basis of digital penetration and multiple incidents not established by the evidence or indictment, resulting in sentences that were wrong in principle and manifestly excessive; sentences for counts 2, 5, and 6 were reduced to reflect only single incidents as per the indictment and evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: John Anthony Turner; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentences for counts 2, 5, and 6 reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Historic Child Abuse, Totality Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Anthony Turner
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred by sentencing on the basis of digital penetration not alleged by the Crown
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the gravity of the offending
- 3 Whether the principle of totality was properly applied
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by sentencing on the basis of digital penetration and multiple incidents not established by the evidence or indictment, resulting in sentences that were wrong in principle and manifestly excessive; sentences for counts 2, 5, and 6 were reduced to reflect only single incidents as per the indictment and evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentences for counts 2, 5, and 6 reduced.
Orders
- Sentences of 6 years on counts 2, 5, and 6 quashed and replaced with 4 years each.
- Total sentence reduced from 16 years to 12 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment