Steven Ellis & Ors v John Benson Limited

Steven Ellis & Ors v John Benson Limited

The franchise agreements, due to their long-term nature, significant control by JBL, lack of independent advice, and vulnerability of franchisees, were subject to implied terms of good faith, fair dealing, and trust and confidence. JBL, through Mr Benson, breached these terms by creating an abusive, intimidatory, and discriminatory environment, imposing arbitrary restrictions on franchisees' ability to market themselves, unilaterally varying contract terms during COVID, and repeatedly threatening litigation in an intimidatory manner. These breaches, individually and cumulatively, went to the root of the contracts and entitled the claimants to treat the agreements as repudiated and...

Parties
Claimant: Steven Ellis; Claimant: Stephen Hayward; Claimant: Wayne Monk; Claimant: Kevin Patterson; Claimant: Adrian Robins; Claimant: Janine Rusted; Claimant: John Stubbings; Claimant: Susanna Summers; Claimant: Robert Szatkowski; Claimant: Adam Chapman; Claimant: Amanda Cherry; Claimant: Tomasz Dzierzanowski; Claimant: Michele George; Claimant: Patrick Mackintosh; Claimant: Paul Maples; Claimant: Joanne Newman; Claimant: Helen Patmore; Claimant: Andrew Tanfield; Claimant: Sinead Thornton; Claimant: Claire Freeman; Defendant: John Benson Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil (franchise/contract) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Declarations granted that the represented claimants lawfully terminated their franchise agreements due to JBL's repudiatory breach; counterclaims by JBL fail as against those claimants.
Legal Topics
Implied Terms of Good Faith, Repudiatory Breach, Relational Contracts, Inequality of Bargaining Power, Termination of Franchise Agreements, Trust and Confidence, Discretionary Powers in Contracts
Contract Law Franchise Law Employment Law (analogous) Implied Terms of Good Faith Repudiatory Breach Relational Contracts Inequality of Bargaining Power Termination of Franchise Agreements +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Steven Ellis

Claimant

Stephen Hayward

Claimant

Wayne Monk

Claimant

Kevin Patterson

Claimant

Adrian Robins

Claimant

Janine Rusted

Claimant

John Stubbings

Claimant

Susanna Summers

Claimant

Robert Szatkowski

Claimant

Adam Chapman

Claimant

Amanda Cherry

Claimant

Tomasz Dzierzanowski

Claimant

Michele George

Claimant

Patrick Mackintosh

Claimant

Paul Maples

Claimant

Joanne Newman

Claimant

Helen Patmore

Claimant

Andrew Tanfield

Claimant

Sinead Thornton

Claimant

Claire Freeman

Claimant

John Benson Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (franchise/contract) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether franchise agreements contained implied terms of good faith and fair dealing
  2. 2 Whether JBL breached express or implied terms of the franchise agreements
  3. 3 Whether the breaches were repudiatory and entitled the claimants to terminate

Ratio Decidendi

The franchise agreements, due to their long-term nature, significant control by JBL, lack of independent advice, and vulnerability of franchisees, were subject to implied terms of good faith, fair dealing, and trust and confidence. JBL, through Mr Benson, breached these terms by creating an abusive, intimidatory, and discriminatory environment, imposing arbitrary restrictions on franchisees' ability to market themselves, unilaterally varying contract terms during COVID, and repeatedly threatening litigation in an intimidatory manner. These breaches, individually and cumulatively, went to the root of the contracts and entitled the claimants to treat the agreements as repudiated and...

Court Disposition

Declarations granted that the represented claimants lawfully terminated their franchise agreements due to JBL's repudiatory breach; counterclaims by JBL fail as against those claimants.

Orders

  • Declarations that the represented claimants' franchise agreements were lawfully discharged and they are no longer bound by any terms of those agreements.
  • Directions for parties to agree a draft order and address the position of unrepresented claimants.