Boyd v Incommunities Ltd

Boyd v Incommunities Ltd

The trial judge properly evaluated the reliability of anonymous hearsay evidence, considering the Defendant's criminal history, corroborating admissions, and residents' fear. The finding of anti-social behaviour was justified and did not contravene Article 6 ECHR. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: John Boyd; Respondent: Incommunities Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (bradford County Court)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Possession Proceedings, Anti Social Behaviour, Hearsay Evidence, Anonymous Witnesses, Article 6 ECHR, Housing Act 1988
Landlord and Tenant Civil Procedure Human Rights Possession Proceedings Anti Social Behaviour Hearsay Evidence Anonymous Witnesses Article 6 ECHR +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Boyd

Appellant

Incommunities Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (bradford County Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in relying on anonymous hearsay evidence to find anti-social behaviour
  2. 2 Whether admission of anonymous evidence contravened Article 6 ECHR
  3. 3 Whether the finding of anti-social behaviour should be set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge properly evaluated the reliability of anonymous hearsay evidence, considering the Defendant's criminal history, corroborating admissions, and residents' fear. The finding of anti-social behaviour was justified and did not contravene Article 6 ECHR. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Order for possession upheld
  • Suspension of possession order for two years on compliance with tenancy agreement and payment terms