Ikea Ltd & Ors v Brown & Ors

Ikea Ltd & Ors v Brown & Ors

The Sixth Defendant's counterclaim fails to disclose a reasonable cause of action for malicious prosecution (criminal or civil), malicious falsehood, or maliciously procuring arrest, as the pleadings are incoherent, do not address the legal requirements, and English law does not recognize a general tort of malicious prosecution of civil proceedings.

Parties
Claimant: IKEA Limited; Claimant: IKEA Wholesale Limited; Claimant: IKEA Trading Services (UK) Limited; Defendant: John Brown; Defendant: Maria Brenda Brown; Defendant: Paul Hoult; Defendant: Amanda Hoult; Defendant: Gerold Hoop; Defendant: Paul Appleby Walker; Defendant: Adam Hauxwell-Smith; Defendant: Leisa Hauxwell-Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out Counterclaim
Outcome
counterclaim struck out
Legal Topics
Malicious Prosecution, Malicious Falsehood, Strike Out, Counterclaim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

IKEA Limited

Claimant

IKEA Wholesale Limited

Claimant

IKEA Trading Services (UK) Limited

Claimant

John Brown

Defendant

Maria Brenda Brown

Defendant

Paul Hoult

Defendant

Amanda Hoult

Defendant

Gerold Hoop

Defendant

Paul Appleby Walker

Defendant

Adam Hauxwell-Smith

Defendant

Leisa Hauxwell-Smith

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application to Strike Out Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the Sixth Defendant's counterclaim discloses a reasonable cause of action for malicious prosecution (criminal and civil), malicious falsehood, and maliciously procuring arrest.

Ratio Decidendi

The Sixth Defendant's counterclaim fails to disclose a reasonable cause of action for malicious prosecution (criminal or civil), malicious falsehood, or maliciously procuring arrest, as the pleadings are incoherent, do not address the legal requirements, and English law does not recognize a general tort of malicious prosecution of civil proceedings.

Court Disposition

counterclaim struck out

Orders

  • Counterclaim by the Sixth Defendant is struck out.