Denekamp v Denekamp
The appellant's claims are statute barred as he knew all material facts necessary to bring his claim; ignorance of the law is not a ground for extending limitation. The deed of variation stands, and the remaining claims are without merit. The civil restraint order and dismissal of contempt proceedings were justified...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: John Charles Denekamp; Respondent: Mabel Denekamp; Respondent: Johan Denekamp; Respondent: Mr Vaughan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Deed of Variation, Civil Restraint Orders, Contempt of Court
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Charles Denekamp
Appellant
Mabel Denekamp
Respondent
Johan Denekamp
Respondent
Mr Vaughan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's claims are statute barred under the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the deed of variation can be annulled due to alleged negligence and concealment
- 3 Whether the civil restraint order was properly made
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's claims are statute barred as he knew all material facts necessary to bring his claim; ignorance of the law is not a ground for extending limitation. The deed of variation stands, and the remaining claims are without merit. The civil restraint order and dismissal of contempt proceedings were justified and not plainly wrong.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal against the order of 30th September dismissed
- Application for permission to appeal against the civil restraint order dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment