R v John Daniels

R v John Daniels

The lower receiver found at the Defendant’s address is a 'receiver' for the purpose of s.57(1D) of the Firearms Act 1968. The classification is a question of law. The capability requirement depends on whether only minor repair is needed for the part to be used as part of a lethal barrelled or prohibited weapon; this is a matter for the jury based on the facts. The Defendant’s intent is not determinative at this stage.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Defendant: John Daniels
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Legal Ruling
Outcome
Legal ruling on preliminary issues; matter to proceed to trial.
Legal Topics
Firearms, Statutory Interpretation, Component Parts, Possession Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

John Daniels

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Legal Ruling

  1. 1 Whether a lower receiver is a 'receiver' under s.57(1D) of the Firearms Act 1968
  2. 2 Whether the lower receiver was 'capable of being used as a part of a lethal barrelled weapon or a prohibited weapon' given the broken hammer
  3. 3 Whether the classification of the lower receiver is a question of law or fact

Ratio Decidendi

The lower receiver found at the Defendant’s address is a 'receiver' for the purpose of s.57(1D) of the Firearms Act 1968. The classification is a question of law. The capability requirement depends on whether only minor repair is needed for the part to be used as part of a lethal barrelled or prohibited weapon; this is a matter for the jury based on the facts. The Defendant’s intent is not determinative at this stage.

Court Disposition

Legal ruling on preliminary issues; matter to proceed to trial.

Orders

  • The lower receiver is a 'receiver' under s.57(1D) of the Firearms Act 1968 as a matter of law.
  • The issue of 'capability' given the broken hammer is for the jury, depending on whether only minor repair is required.