R v John Dooley
The sentencing judge was entitled to raise the starting point for the second burglary due to the significant financial and sentimental value of the stolen items and psychological harm to the victim. Previous convictions were properly treated as aggravating, and mitigation was limited. The aggregate sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: John Dooley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Burglary, Sentencing, Aggravating Factors, Mitigation, Totality Principle, Failure to Surrender
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
John Dooley
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in raising the starting point for the second burglary
- 2 Whether previous convictions were wrongly treated as aggravating factors
- 3 Whether sufficient account was taken of personal mitigation and totality
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to raise the starting point for the second burglary due to the significant financial and sentimental value of the stolen items and psychological harm to the victim. Previous convictions were properly treated as aggravating, and mitigation was limited. The aggregate sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
renewed applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment