R v John Edwin Charles Taylor

R v John Edwin Charles Taylor

There was no good reason for the delay in applying for leave to appeal, and the grounds advanced were wholly without merit. The conviction was safe and the sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive. The applications for extension of time and leave to appeal were refused.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: John Edwin Charles Taylor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Breach of Non Molestation Order, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Conviction, Sentence
Criminal Law Breach of Non Molestation Order Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Conviction Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

John Edwin Charles Taylor

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was good reason to extend time for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence
  2. 2 Whether the conviction was unsafe
  3. 3 Whether the sentence was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

There was no good reason for the delay in applying for leave to appeal, and the grounds advanced were wholly without merit. The conviction was safe and the sentence was neither wrong in principle nor manifestly excessive. The applications for extension of time and leave to appeal were refused.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Applicant to pay reasonable costs of transcripts in the amount of £84.84