John Forster Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd
The statutory demand is set aside because (1) there is a substantial dispute as to whether the statutory demand debt was assigned to MWP, and (2) the applicant has established a cross-demand exceeding the amount of the statutory demand debt.
- Parties
- Applicant: John Forster Emmott; Respondent: Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Application allowed; statutory demand set aside
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Set Off, Assignment of Debt, Limitation Period, Cross Demand, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Forster Emmott
Applicant
Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand debt was owed by the applicant to the respondent
- 2 Whether the statutory demand debt was assigned to the respondent
- 3 Whether the statutory demand debt is statute-barred under the Limitation Act 1980
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory demand is set aside because (1) there is a substantial dispute as to whether the statutory demand debt was assigned to MWP, and (2) the applicant has established a cross-demand exceeding the amount of the statutory demand debt.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; statutory demand set aside
Orders
- The statutory demand dated 31 March 2021 is set aside.
- Time for making the application is extended to 24 May 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment