R v John Fowler
The convictions were safe as the jury was not misled, the fresh evidence would not have affected the verdict, and there was no material irregularity. However, the finding of dangerousness was not justified due to inconsistencies in the pre-sentence report, and the extended sentence was quashed and replaced with a...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: John Fowler
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Conviction appeal refused; sentence appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Appeals, Sentence, Dangerousness, Fresh Evidence, Cross Admissibility, Jury Directions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
John Fowler
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the convictions were unsafe due to alleged disclosure failures and fresh evidence
- 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive and whether the finding of dangerousness was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The convictions were safe as the jury was not misled, the fresh evidence would not have affected the verdict, and there was no material irregularity. However, the finding of dangerousness was not justified due to inconsistencies in the pre-sentence report, and the extended sentence was quashed and replaced with a determinate sentence of 8 years.
Court Disposition
Conviction appeal refused; sentence appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Extension of time and leave to appeal against sentence granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment