Francis, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 3156 (09 December 2004)

Francis, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 3156 (09 December 2004)

The Court held that none of the grounds of appeal, including the failure to require further particularisation, the exclusion of evidence regarding the size of the appellant's penis, and the omission of a standard recent complaint direction, rendered the conviction unsafe. The evidence and directions given were sufficient and proper, and the conviction was upheld.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Crim 3156
Parties
Prosecution: R; Appellant: John Francis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence After Retrial
Outcome
appeal against conviction dismissed; renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Hearsay Evidence, Recent Complaint, Admissibility of Evidence, Jury Directions, Abuse of Process, Video Evidence, Consent, Sufficiency of Evidence
Criminal Law Rape Hearsay Evidence Recent Complaint Admissibility of Evidence Jury Directions Abuse of Process Video Evidence +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

John Francis

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence After Retrial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to require further particularisation of indictment counts
  2. 2 Whether the exclusion of evidence regarding the size of the appellant's penis rendered the conviction unsafe
  3. 3 Whether the failure to give a standard direction on recent complaint evidence rendered the conviction unsafe

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that none of the grounds of appeal, including the failure to require further particularisation, the exclusion of evidence regarding the size of the appellant's penis, and the omission of a standard recent complaint direction, rendered the conviction unsafe. The evidence and directions given were sufficient and proper, and the conviction was upheld.

Court Disposition

appeal against conviction dismissed; renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed