Buckinghamshire Council v Ward & Ors
The interim injunction was necessary and proportionate to prevent further unauthorised development and occupation of the land, maintain the status quo, and protect the planning process, with alternative service and without notice procedure justified by the risk of further unauthorised works if notice were given.
- Parties
- Claimant: Buckinghamshire Council; Defendant: John James Ward; Defendant: Kaley Guest; Defendant: Rose Gentle; Defendant: Savannah Casey; Defendant: Alex Harris; Defendant: Mikala McCarthy; Defendant: Persons Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (planning/injunction) / Interim Injunction Application (ex Parte)
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Enforcement of Planning Control, Alternative Service, Without Notice Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Buckinghamshire Council
Claimant
John James Ward
Defendant
Kaley Guest
Defendant
Rose Gentle
Defendant
Savannah Casey
Defendant
Alex Harris
Defendant
Mikala McCarthy
Defendant
Persons Unknown
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (planning/injunction) / Interim Injunction Application (ex Parte)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim injunction should be granted to restrain further development and occupation of land without planning permission
- 2 Whether the application should proceed without notice
- 3 Whether alternative service is justified
Ratio Decidendi
The interim injunction was necessary and proportionate to prevent further unauthorised development and occupation of the land, maintain the status quo, and protect the planning process, with alternative service and without notice procedure justified by the risk of further unauthorised works if notice were given.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted
Orders
- Prohibitory interim injunction restraining further encampment, occupation, stationing of caravans, plant or machinery, or further development without permission
- Order for alternative service at the site and to the First Defendant's registered address
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment