Barclays Bank Plc v Holmes & Ors [2000] EWHC Ch 457 (21 November 2000)

Barclays Bank Plc v Holmes & Ors [2000] EWHC Ch 457 (21 November 2000)

The 37th Deed created a single trust fund supporting both the 1964 Scheme and RIS. The Bank was entitled to use surplus to fund RIS contributions, and the amendments did not breach Clause 12(ii). The introduction of the RIS was within the powers of the Bank and Trustee. The 41st Deed was valid and effective and not invalidated by Section 67 of the Pensions Act 1995.

Citation
[2000] EWHC Ch 457
Parties
Claimant: Barclays Bank PLC; Defendant: John M. Holmes; Defendant: Barclays Pension Funds Trustees Limited; Defendant: The Pensions Ombudsman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Part 8 Claim / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Pensions Ombudsman and Part 8 Claim
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Part 8 claim granted
Legal Topics
Pension Fund Surplus, Hybrid Pension Schemes, Trust Deed Construction, Employer Contributions, Pensions Act 1995, Scheme Amendments, Section 67 Pensions Act, Maladministration
Pensions Law Trusts Law Employment Law Pension Fund Surplus Hybrid Pension Schemes Trust Deed Construction Employer Contributions Pensions Act 1995 +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barclays Bank PLC

Claimant

John M. Holmes

Defendant

Barclays Pension Funds Trustees Limited

Defendant

The Pensions Ombudsman

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Part 8 Claim / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Pensions Ombudsman and Part 8 Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 37th Deed created a single trust fund or two separate funds for the 1964 Scheme and RIS
  2. 2 Whether the Bank could use surplus to fund RIS contributions
  3. 3 Whether the amendments breached Clause 12(ii) of the 1964 Deed

Ratio Decidendi

The 37th Deed created a single trust fund supporting both the 1964 Scheme and RIS. The Bank was entitled to use surplus to fund RIS contributions, and the amendments did not breach Clause 12(ii). The introduction of the RIS was within the powers of the Bank and Trustee. The 41st Deed was valid and effective and not invalidated by Section 67 of the Pensions Act 1995.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Part 8 claim granted

Orders

  • The determination of the Pensions Ombudsman is set aside.
  • Declaration granted that the 41st Deed is valid and effective.