R v John McNair
The hearsay evidence of the deceased complainant was properly admitted under section 116 CJA 2003, the trial judge correctly refused to revisit the hearsay ruling and to dismiss the case under section 125, as the reliability of the complainant's evidence was capable of proper testing and assessment by the jury, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: John McNair
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Hearsay Evidence, Fair Trial, Admissibility of Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
John McNair
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting hearsay evidence of the deceased complainant under section 116 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to revisit the hearsay ruling after prosecution witnesses fell away
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to dismiss the case under section 125 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The hearsay evidence of the deceased complainant was properly admitted under section 116 CJA 2003, the trial judge correctly refused to revisit the hearsay ruling and to dismiss the case under section 125, as the reliability of the complainant's evidence was capable of proper testing and assessment by the jury, and the conviction was safe.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment