Noble, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 399 (26 January 2024)
The sentence of 10 years' custody (within a 14-year extended sentence) was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, multiplicity, and escalation of the offences, the aggravating features, and the limited mitigation. The reduction for the absence of a real child and the application of totality were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 399
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: John Peter Noble
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Extended Sentences, Dangerousness, Totality Principle, Credit for Guilty Plea
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
John Peter Noble
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial term of 10 years was manifestly excessive for the offences committed
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge double-counted aggravating features or failed to give sufficient reduction for the absence of a real child
- 3 Whether the total sentence imposed was just and proportionate to the offending as a whole
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 10 years' custody (within a 14-year extended sentence) was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, multiplicity, and escalation of the offences, the aggravating features, and the limited mitigation. The reduction for the absence of a real child and the application of totality were appropriate. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Record to be amended to reflect the judge's sentences on the individual offences as analysed by the Court of Appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment