Fadallah v Pollak

Fadallah v Pollak

Eagle Power Ltd. did not have title to the Generating Sets at the time of sale to the claimant, as property was retained by the defendant until payment, which never occurred. Eagle was not a mercantile agent for the defendant, and statutory provisions relied upon by the claimant did not apply. Consequently, the...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Tahir Fadallah; Defendant: John Pollak
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
action dismissed
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods, Passing of Title, Mercantile Agent, Constructive Delivery, Retention of Title
Commercial Law Sale of Goods Passing of Title Mercantile Agent Constructive Delivery Retention of Title

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tahir Fadallah

Claimant

John Pollak

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Eagle Power Ltd. had authority and title to sell the Generating Sets to the claimant
  2. 2 Whether the claimant acquired good title to the Generating Sets under English law
  3. 3 Applicability of Sale of Goods Act 1979 sections 21, 24, and 25

Ratio Decidendi

Eagle Power Ltd. did not have title to the Generating Sets at the time of sale to the claimant, as property was retained by the defendant until payment, which never occurred. Eagle was not a mercantile agent for the defendant, and statutory provisions relied upon by the claimant did not apply. Consequently, the claimant did not acquire good title and cannot succeed against the defendant.

Court Disposition

action dismissed