Lambert, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 827 (21 March 2006)

Lambert, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 827 (21 March 2006)

The convictions and sentences were upheld as the evidence against the appellants was compelling, disclosure was adequate, evidentiary and procedural complaints did not undermine the safety of the verdicts, and the sentences reflected the seriousness and aggravation of the offences.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Crim 827
Parties
Applicant: John Ritchie Lambert; Applicant: Lee James McGrath; Appellant: Alan Brown; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal and Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted but appeals dismissed.
Legal Topics
Prison Mutiny, Sentencing, Disclosure, Fair Trial, Bad Character Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Ritchie Lambert

Applicant

Lee James McGrath

Applicant

Alan Brown

Appellant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal and Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether convictions for prison mutiny and associated offences should be upheld
  2. 2 Whether sentences imposed were excessive
  3. 3 Whether disclosure failures or evidentiary issues rendered the trial unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The convictions and sentences were upheld as the evidence against the appellants was compelling, disclosure was adequate, evidentiary and procedural complaints did not undermine the safety of the verdicts, and the sentences reflected the seriousness and aggravation of the offences.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted but appeals dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted for Lambert and McGrath
  • Appeals against conviction and sentence for Brown, Lambert, and McGrath dismissed