Newton, R. v
The original sentence of 18 years before credit for guilty plea was manifestly excessive given the facts; the appropriate term after trial was 15 years, reduced to 10 years for guilty plea. The extended licence period of eight years was justified and not excessive.
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: John Robert Newton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Extended Sentences, Dangerousness, Breach of Suspended Sentence, Sexual Offences Prevention Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
John Robert Newton
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriateness of extended sentence and licence period
- 3 Dangerousness of the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of 18 years before credit for guilty plea was manifestly excessive given the facts; the appropriate term after trial was 15 years, reduced to 10 years for guilty plea. The extended licence period of eight years was justified and not excessive.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced.
Orders
- Substitute a term of 10 years imprisonment for the principal offence.
- Extended licence period of eight years maintained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment