Vehicle & Operator Services Agency v Clayton [2010] EWHC 289 (Admin) (19 January 2010)
A vehicle used solely to carry a hearse carriage and horses to be used in a funeral procession is not, by that fact alone, 'a vehicle which is being used for funerals' within the meaning of schedule 3(5) of the Goods Vehicle (Licensing of Operators) Regulations 1995. The use of the lorry to transport the hearse and horses to the funeral location is too remote from the funeral itself to qualify for the exemption.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 289 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Vehicle and Operator Services Agency; Defendant: John Roger Clayton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Case Stated / Divisional Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; magistrates' decision reversed; exemption not applicable
- Legal Topics
- Operator's Licence Exemption, Interpretation of 'used for Funerals', Goods Vehicles (licensing of Operators) Act 1995, Goods Vehicles (licensing of Operators) Regulations 1995
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
Claimant
John Roger Clayton
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Case Stated / Divisional Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a vehicle used solely to carry a hearse carriage and horses to be used in a funeral procession qualifies as 'a vehicle which is being used for funerals' under schedule 3(5) of the Goods Vehicle (Licensing of Operators) Regulations 1995
Ratio Decidendi
A vehicle used solely to carry a hearse carriage and horses to be used in a funeral procession is not, by that fact alone, 'a vehicle which is being used for funerals' within the meaning of schedule 3(5) of the Goods Vehicle (Licensing of Operators) Regulations 1995. The use of the lorry to transport the hearse and horses to the funeral location is too remote from the funeral itself to qualify for the exemption.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; magistrates' decision reversed; exemption not applicable
Orders
- Question posed by the justices answered in the negative; no further order; no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment