Iconic Sports Eagle Investment, LLC v John Textor

Iconic Sports Eagle Investment, LLC v John Textor

Clauses 3.2 and 3.3 of the Put Option Agreement are concurrent conditions requiring both parties to be ready and willing to perform their obligations simultaneously; Iconic was ready and willing, JT was not, so Iconic is entitled to specific performance.

Parties
Claimant: Iconic Sports Eagle Investment, LLC; Defendant: John Textor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 November 2026
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Expedited Trial of Preliminary Issues
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant
Legal Topics
Put Option Agreement, Specific Performance, Concurrent Conditions, Share Sale, Default Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iconic Sports Eagle Investment, LLC

Claimant

John Textor

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Dispute / Expedited Trial of Preliminary Issues

  1. 1 Whether Clauses 3.2 and 3.3 of the Put Option Agreement are concurrent conditions
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant was ready and willing to perform its obligations under Clause 3.2 on the Repayment Date
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant was ready and willing to perform his obligations under Clause 3.3 on the Repayment Date

Ratio Decidendi

Clauses 3.2 and 3.3 of the Put Option Agreement are concurrent conditions requiring both parties to be ready and willing to perform their obligations simultaneously; Iconic was ready and willing, JT was not, so Iconic is entitled to specific performance.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant

Orders

  • Clauses 3.2 and 3.3 are concurrent conditions
  • Iconic was ready and willing to perform its obligations