Phillips v Whiddett [2011] EWHC 90218 (Costs) (19 December 2011)
The claimant is entitled to recover the ATE premium in full because it was not shown to be disproportionate or unreasonable; the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the reasonableness of the premium, and the approach in Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil remains binding.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 90218 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant: Maurice Phillips; Defendant: John Whiddett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Only Claim Under CPR 44.12 a / Assessment of Costs Following Settlement of Personal Injury Claim
- Outcome
- Claimant entitled to recover ATE premium in full.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, ATE Insurance Premium Recoverability, Proportionality of Costs, Reasonableness of Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maurice Phillips
Claimant
John Whiddett
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Only Claim Under CPR 44.12 a / Assessment of Costs Following Settlement of Personal Injury Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the claimant entitled to recover the ATE insurance premium as part of costs?
- 2 Is the amount of the ATE premium disproportionate or unreasonable in the circumstances?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to recover the ATE premium in full because it was not shown to be disproportionate or unreasonable; the defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the reasonableness of the premium, and the approach in Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil remains binding.
Court Disposition
Claimant entitled to recover ATE premium in full.
Orders
- Defendant to pay the claimant's ATE insurance premium of £418.70 as part of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment