L'Oreal (UK) Ltd & Anr v. Johnson & Johnson & Anr [2000] EWHC Ch 129 (7th March, 2000)
The Defendants' letter, read in context, constituted a threat of trade mark infringement proceedings sufficient to engage Section 21 and manifested a real issue and adverse claim, justifying the Claimants' application for declaratory relief.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC Ch 129
- Parties
- Claimant: L'Oréal (UK) Limited; Claimant: Golden Limited; Defendant: Johnson & Johnson; Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Master Bragge's Order Striking Out Claims
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Declaratory Relief, Unjustified Threats, Inherent Jurisdiction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L'Oréal (UK) Limited
Claimant
Golden Limited
Claimant
Johnson & Johnson
Defendant
Johnson & Johnson Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Master Bragge's Order Striking Out Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes a threat for purposes of Section 21 of the Trade Marks Act 1994
- 2 What are sufficient grounds for seeking a declaration of non-infringement under inherent jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendants' letter, read in context, constituted a threat of trade mark infringement proceedings sufficient to engage Section 21 and manifested a real issue and adverse claim, justifying the Claimants' application for declaratory relief.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Claims for unjustified threats and declaration of non-infringement to stand and proceed to trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment